Shades of Care: Racial Disparities in Pain Treatment

Anoushka Bhatt

Illustrations by Nancy Duer

Pain is a distinctly personal experience; it is internal, often difficult to articulate, and largely invisible to the naked eye. Others can’t see it, touch it, or quantify it in a way that captures its subjective experience. The invisibility can be isolating. Even in the presence of support, people in pain can be left feeling alone and ostracized. For some people of color, these experiences are exacerbated by a medical system that not only fails to see their pain but questions whether their discomfort exists at all [1]. When suffering is dismissed and voices are silenced, it’s more than neglect — it is an institutional betrayal of care [2]. This isn’t just an individual experience; it is foundational to a long history of racial bias in pain medicine that continues to shape outcomes today [3, 4, 5]. In the early nineteenth century, scientists, physicians, and slaveholders propagated myths about Black pain to justify slavery, one being that Black people’s skin was less sensitive to pain than that of White people [1, 6]. The medical mistreatment of Black people continued through the late 1800s, with notable figures in medicine like Dr. J. Marion Sims, known as the father of gynecology, conducting unethical medical experiments on enslaved Black women without anesthesia [6, 7, 8]. Similar maltreatment and harmful beliefs persist in the modern era of medicine [1, 9]. As recently as 2016, 50% of a group of White medical students and residents surveyed at a large public university held at least one false belief about pain in Black people [1]. Some fallacious beliefs included the notions that Black people’s skin was thicker, their nerve endings were less sensitive, and their blood clotted quicker than White people’s [1]. Historical injustices and misconceptions about pain have led to lasting maltreatment of people of color by medical institutions [1]. Medical bias is still entrenched in medical institutions and continues to affect the treatment of people of color today [10].

The Journey to the Hospital: Barriers Before Treatment

A multitude of barriers hinder people of color from accessing timely and effective treatment [11, 12, 13]. People of color face discriminatory obstacles originating from systemic racism, a term that refers to racial biases that are deeply entrenched within policies and practices [14]. Racial biases extend across interconnected systems, including education, housing, politics, criminal justice, and healthcare, all of which together perpetuate a lower standard of care for racial minorities [14] As a result, untreated and mismanaged conditions contribute to increased physical pain, heightened emotional distress, and diminished quality of life for many people of color [15, 16, 17]. Furthermore, racial minorities are more likely to live in areas that lack access to essential healthcare resources, known as healthcare deserts [12, 13, 18]. Individuals living in healthcare deserts face a lack of access to medical facilities, longer wait times, and disproportionately higher costs of health services [11, 13, 19]. Healthcare deserts pose a considerable challenge for communities of color to access even the most basic healthcare needs, including primary care services, emergency medical services, pharmacies, and preventive medications [11, 19, 20]. 

A lack of access to healthcare not only limits general healthcare services but also hinders the diagnostic process of more severe diseases [21]. People of color face barriers to receiving essential preventive screenings — a crucial step in diagnosis [22, 23, 24]. When access to preventive screenings is impeded, diseases may progress unchecked, symptoms and pain can be exacerbated, and the risk of fatal outcomes may increase [21]. For example, Indigenous American people face significantly lower cancer screening rates despite having the highest risk and mortality rate for various cancers, including kidney, liver, stomach, and cervical cancer [25, 26, 27]. A lack of early detection can manifest in delayed diagnoses and advanced disease stages, potentially contributing to additional pain and the need for more invasive treatments [28, 29, 30]. Indigenous women exhibit the lowest rates of mammography, a form of X-ray imaging designed to detect cancers and other changes in breast tissue [25]. Only 59% of Indigenous women receive mammograms, compared to 76% of White women who are screened for breast cancer [25, 31]. Moreover, Indigenous women experience a higher likelihood of suffering from late-stage cancer complications and have a 30% higher breast cancer mortality rate than White women [25, 31]. Later-stage breast cancer can be excruciatingly painful as the cancer spreads throughout the body and invades nerves and bone [32]. Breast cancer that infiltrates the nerves can result in agonizing, sharp, burning pain that radiates through the body, while cancer invading the bone can cause a deep, aching pain [33, 34, 35]. Furthermore, chronic inflammation associated with breast cancer triggers hypersensitivity in the nervous system, leading to heightened, persistent, and widespread pain that extends beyond the tumor site [36, 37, 38]. In the advanced stages of breast cancer, pain becomes more widespread and often requires more invasive interventions for relief [39]. Lower rates of breast cancer screenings and diagnoses can lead to delayed intervention, resulting in more painful cases of the disease among Indigenous women [26, 27]. Systemic barriers that limit access to preventive care contribute to a cycle of pain that disproportionately burdens communities of color [15, 40, 41].

Data Disparities: Bias in Medical Algorithms

Even for those who receive preventive testing, racial biases continue to disproportionately affect healthcare outcomes through diagnostic tools and algorithms like risk prediction models and machine-learning systems [42, 43, 44]. Medical algorithms, such as those used to calculate stroke risk or predict kidney failure, offer a framework to help healthcare professionals make informed decisions based on an individual’s clinical data [45, 46, 47]. However, not all medical algorithms can be generalized to all races, as different ethnic groups can have genetic and biological differences that may result in the disproportionate occurrence of certain conditions across groups [48]. Thus, generalized references provided by these algorithms are often unsuited to assess people of color [43, 49]. Reference intervals are a key component of medical algorithms, which are sets of values defining the standard range for a given test result [50]. That being said, reference intervals tend to be developed utilizing data from medical studies primarily consisting of White male participants, leading to biased assessments for other racial and gender groups [43, 49, 51]. Over 50% of laboratory tests with reference intervals fail to account for differences in baselines between racial groups, revealing a major representational issue in categorizing diagnostic results [52]. 

A notable example of an algorithm generalized to people of color is the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk calculator, which estimates a person’s ten-year risk of heart disease or stroke [53, 54]. The ASCVD calculator factors in age, cholesterol levels, blood pressure, and race — categorizing individuals as White, Black, or ‘other,’ with an option to exclude race entirely from the calculation [53, 54]. However, the limited racial categories fail to distinguish between diverse populations within the ‘other’ group, making it difficult to account for critical variations such as age-related risk and cholesterol levels [55]. Compared to White populations, South Asian populations tend to develop cardiovascular disease at a younger age and have a higher prevalence of heart attacks and strokes [56, 57]. South Asian people also tend to experience more severe disease outcomes at lower cholesterol levels compared to other racial groups, suggesting that traditional reference ranges may not be reliable for assessing cardiovascular risk in this population [57, 58, 59]. Therefore, the ASCVD risk calculator fails to account for unique risk factors that contribute to the underdiagnosis and undertreatment of cardiovascular conditions in South Asian individuals [58, 60]. As a result of undiagnosed ASCVD, South Asian people may endure prolonged chest pain, fatigue, and other debilitating symptoms before receiving an accurate diagnosis [61, 62]. ASCVD can also manifest in neck, back, and even abdominal pain when unmanaged [61, 62]. As risk factors accumulate and progress to heart disease, pain may spread further to the arms or legs, often accompanied by shortness of breath, palpitations, nausea, sweating, or lightheadedness [62]. Beyond cardiovascular disease, the broader implications of biased medical algorithms extend to many other conditions, including kidney disease and vitamin B12 deficiency, exacerbating racial discrepancies in pain management [44, 52, 50]. Racial minorities are more likely to have their pain underestimated and undertreated due to biases in diagnostic tools, contributing to unnecessary suffering and, consequently, lower quality of life [1, 63]. Individualized approaches incorporating genetics, lifestyle, and socioeconomic factors could improve the accuracy and equity of cardiovascular risk assessment [64]. By addressing biases in medical algorithms and ensuring that diverse populations are adequately represented in research, healthcare systems can provide more precise diagnoses and effective symptom management that would ultimately improve pain outcomes across racial groups.

Assessment and Treatment: Whose Pain Counts?

Upon immediate arrival at emergency rooms, people of color face further inequities in pain assessment. [65, 66, 67]. Black people experience 35% longer wait times than White people afflicted with similar conditions, delaying access to critical pain management and medical intervention[66, 68, 69]. Delayed care for Black, Asian, and Hispanic people significantly reduces their chances of receiving timely interventions for potentially life-threatening strokes and often results in prolonged, unmanaged pain [69]. When analyzing an individual’s condition to determine how quickly the person receives treatment — otherwise known as an urgency evaluation — a healthcare provider would ideally base their assessment solely on medical urgency [70]. However, urgency evaluations can be distorted by implicit biases that minimize or dismiss the pain experiences of people of color [70]. The longstanding and harmful myth that people of color have a higher pain tolerance contributes to the systematic underestimation of their suffering, leading to the dismissal of both self-reported pain and even physically evident distress [1, 71, 72]. As a result of discrepancies in assessment, people of color may be assigned lower priorities for receiving care despite presenting with severe symptoms [70, 73, 74]. Lower-priority assignments in healthcare can manifest as longer wait times, reduced attention from medical professionals, and the dismissal of individual concerns [74]. Disparities in access to adequate and timely care not only aggravate immediate suffering but also lead to long-term health consequences, reinforcing a cycle of pain mismanagement and eroding trust in the healthcare system [75, 76].

Once admitted to the hospital, inequities in pain assessment can quickly lead to discrepancies in pain management for people of color [1]. Black people are significantly less likely to receive adequate pain medication than White people, even for identical pain reports [1, 77, 78]. Due to stereotypes about people of color’s drug-seeking behavior, which was partly informed by the opioid crisis, racial minorities are less likely to be prescribed opioids, a powerful and addictive class of pain medication [79, 80]. The opioid crisis was at first characterized by a medical overprescription of opioid drugs [81, 82]. Historically, the crisis was concentrated among White, rural, and working-class communities [79, 83]. However, the impact of the opioid crisis on Black and Hispanic communities has worsened substantially in recent years, influencing stereotypes about opioid use within these communities [79, 83]. As extensive opioid abuse worsened and public health efforts sought to curb overprescription, the rise of fentanyl — a synthetic opioid that is often added to illicit substances — shifted the influence of the crisis from white communities to communities of color [81, 84]. Greater use of illegal drugs laced with fentanyl within Black and Hispanic communities led to a disproportionate rate of opioid overdose and addiction, shaping harmful stereotypes about drug-seeking behavior in medical settings [79, 83, 85]. These stereotypes about drug-seeking behavior contribute to the underprescription of opioids in people of color compared to White people [79, 80]. Even when opioids are prescribed, Black and Hispanic people receive lower dosages than White people for equal levels of self-reported pain as a result of drug-seeking stereotypes [79, 85]. Underprescription may contribute to individuals seeking pain relief from illicit substances beyond prescription medications [87, 88]. Not only do White people have better access to opioids to manage their pain, but they are also more likely to be shifted to alternative pain management solutions in situations of opioid dependence or addiction [80, 83, 89]. Black people, on the other hand, are often denied opioids altogether and are much less likely to receive nonopioid forms of pain treatment, like nerve blocks, physical therapy, and surgery [80]. Limited access to alternative treatments may contribute to the dual burden faced by Black communities, being both underserved in pain treatment and criminalized for opioid use rather than being offered rehabilitation approaches [83]. The long-term effects of prescription and rehabilitation disparities continue to shape healthcare experiences, reinforcing mistrust in the medical system and leaving many Black people without adequate pain relief [83, 90, 91].

Racial differences in pain treatment also extend to vulnerable individuals within minority populations, such as children and pregnant people, whose pain is frequently dismissed [92, 93, 94]. For instance, Black and Hispanic pregnant people frequently report having their pain dismissed or undertreated, both during childbirth and in the pre- and post-partum periods [93, 94]. Disregard for the pain of Black and Hispanic pregnant individuals contributes to disproportionately high rates of maternal complications in these communities [93, 95]. Children of color are also affected by racial disparities in medicine; for example, Black children experiencing appendicitis are far less likely to receive appropriate pain relief compared to White children [92]. Asymmetry in pain treatment is also evident in the treatment of chronic illnesses like type 1 diabetes, where access to effective treatment can significantly reduce disease progression and prevent complications such as nerve damage [96]. Black and Hispanic children are less likely to have access to advanced diabetes management technologies, such as continuous glucose monitors and insulin pumps, which can significantly improve long-term health outcomes [97]. Perceived bias and discrimination, poor patient-provider communication, unequal treatment outcomes, and broader systemic barriers disproportionately affect Black and Hispanic children, contributing to differences in care [98]. Persistent disparities in pain assessment and treatment reflect deeply rooted systemic inequities that continue to harm the most vulnerable members of minority communities [99, 100, 101].

The Aftermath: Long-Term Consequences

The consequences of inadequate pain treatment are profound and long-lasting [102, 103, 104]. Unmanaged pain can have severe long-term consequences due to its profound impact on the nervous system and overall well-being [102, 103, 104]. When pain persists without proper management, the nervous system becomes hypersensitive, amplifying pain signals to make even mild discomfort feel unbearable [105, 106]. Over time, pain pathways in the brain are reinforced by maladaptive neuroplasticity, a process that essentially ‘rewires’ the nervous system to prioritize pain perception [102, 107]. Without early intervention, changes in neurological pain perception pathways can entrench individuals in a cycle of escalating pain, emotional distress, and functional impairment, making chronic pain progressively more difficult to manage and treat [108]. This neurological rewiring does not occur in isolation; it often coexists with psychological responses like anxiety and depression, which further reinforce the pain cycle [109, 110, 111]. As a result, people who suffer from chronic pain due to inadequate treatment often experience diminished quality of life and struggle to complete daily activities [112]. For communities already facing barriers to care, these long-term consequences contribute to broader health disparities and place an additional burden on public health systems [22].

Furthermore, the persistent dismissal of pain concerns can foster medical distrust and discourage people of color from seeking care altogether [10, 91, 113]. Communities with histories of medical exploitation, such as the Black community, continue to feel the effects of unethical studies [114]. In the infamous Tuskegee Syphilis Study, hundreds of uninformed Black men were studied to examine the effects of syphilis when left untreated [114]. While informed consent was not legally required when the study began in 1932, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study was unethical even by the standards of its time [115]. Participants were not told they had syphilis but instead that they had ‘bad blood’ to conceal the true purpose of the study and to recruit more participants [116]. Despite penicillin becoming a widely available cure for syphilis during the study, it was never offered to any of the affected men [114]. The participants were also not informed that medication was intentionally withheld from them or that treatment was even available [114]. As a result of the medical malpractice by the doctors and researchers, these men had to endure the symptoms of untreated syphilis [114]. Those infected with syphilis are subjected to a lifetime of suffering, beginning with sores and progressing to symptoms as extreme as bone and joint damage, cardiovascular problems, hearing loss, and blindness [117]. The impact of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study was not limited only to the participants; due to the highly transmissible nature of syphilis, the spouses and children of the men studied were at higher risk of becoming infected and ill [118]. The unethical deception and neglect displayed in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study reinforced a mindset of medical mistrust that persists today within the Black community [114, 116, 119]. Coupled with the ongoing disparities in pain management and treatment, historical trauma contributes to reluctance in seeking medical care and further exacerbates health inequities [114]. The legacy of unethical practices continues to shape perceptions of the healthcare system, fostering skepticism and fear that prevent Black individuals and other minority groups from receiving the care they need [91, 113].

Forced sterilizations of women of color under oppressive and coercive medical policies further deepened medical mistrust in people of color [120, 121, 122]. In the early to mid-20th century, the U.S. government and medical institutions forcibly sterilized thousands of Black women, particularly in the South [120, 122]. The sterilization was based on eugenics, an ideology centered around the selective breeding of people based on prejudiced, ableist, and often racist perceptions of positive or negative traits [120, 122]. Harmful beliefs popularized by eugenic rhetoric falsely deemed thousands of Black women unfit for reproduction [120, 122]. Similarly, Indigenous women were disproportionately targeted for sterilization in the 1960s and 1970s, with many undergoing the procedure without their consent or true understanding of its permanence [123]. Latina women also suffered this violation, as seen in the 1978 Madrigal v. Quilligan case, where many Mexican-American women were coerced into sterilization procedures, often during childbirth [121]. Racist and unethical medical practices such as these sterilizations were rooted in population control efforts and have had lasting effects on minority communities, fostering profound and persistent mistrust in the current healthcare system [120, 121, 123]. The traumatic legacy of forced sterilizations continues to shape the experiences of women of color within the healthcare system today, deterring them from seeking reproductive care due to fears of bodily autonomy violations [124, 125]. The historical exploitation of marginalized communities in the name of medical progress continues to fuel skepticism of healthcare systems, making it imperative to address injustices to rebuild trust and ensure equitable healthcare for all [126].

Ultimately, the racism embedded in pain assessment and treatment is not an isolated issue but is symptomatic of a much larger, interconnected web of systemic oppression [5, 14]. Just as discriminatory practices in healthcare have long-lasting repercussions on the physical and emotional well-being of marginalized communities, systemic inequalities in housing, education, employment, and the criminal justice system also reinforce and perpetuate racial disparities [14, 22]. These systems do not operate in isolation; they intersect to create compounded disadvantages that disproportionately impact people of color [14]. The dismissal of pain, violation of bodily autonomy, and historical exploitation of people of color are all reflective of a broader societal structure that continues to devalue marginalized lives [127]. Recognizing medical racism as a public health threat that manifests in both physical and emotional pain can begin to rebuild trust, promote equity, and ensure that healthcare operates justly and humanely for everyone [128].

Reference List

  1. Hoffman, K. M., Trawalter, S., Axt, J. R., & Oliver, M. N. (2016). Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(16), 4296-4301. doi:10.1073/pnas.1516047113

  2. Rastegar, P., Cai, L., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2025). Racial discrimination as a traumatic bedrock of healthcare avoidance: A pathway through healthcare institutional betrayal and mistrust. Healthcare, 13(5), 486. doi:10.3390/healthcare13050486

  3. Booker, S. Q., Merriwether, E. N., Powell-Roach, K., & Jackson, S. (2024). From stepping stones to scaling mountains: Overcoming racialized disparities in pain management. Pain Management, 14(1), 5-12. doi:10.2217/pmt-2023-0098

  4. Egan, K. (2024). The roots and clinical effects of racial bias in medicine. University of Michigan Undergraduate Research Journal, 17(1), 26-36. doi:10.3998/umurj.5504

  5. Bailey, Z. D., Feldman, J. M., & Bassett, M. T. (2021). How structural racism works – Racist policies as a root cause of U.S. racial health inequities. The New England Journal of Medicine, 384(8), 768-773. doi:10.1056/NEJMms2025396

  6. Trawalter, S., & Hoffman, K. M. (2015). Got pain? Racial bias in perceptions of pain. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(3), 146-157. doi:10.1111/spc3.12161

  7. Vernon, L. F. (2019). J. Marion Sims, MD: Why he and his accomplishments need to continue to be recognized a commentary and historical review. Journal of the National Medical Association, 111(4), 436-446. doi:10.1016/j.jnma.2019.02.002

  8. Wailoo, K. (2018). Historical aspects of race and medicine: The case of J. Marion Sims. Journal of the American Medical Association, 320(15), 1529-1530. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.11944

  9. Deb, B., & Rodman, A. (2024). Racial differences in pain assessment and false beliefs about race in AI models. Journal of the American Medical Association Network Open, 7(10). doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.37977

  10. Hall, O. T., Jordan, A., Teater, J., Dixon-Shambley, K., McKiever, M. E., Baek, M., Garcia, S., Rood, K. M., & Fielin, D. A. (2022). Experiences of racial discrimination in the medical setting and associations with medical mistrust and expectation of care among black patients seeking addiction treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 113(1). doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108551

  11. Satcher, L. A. (2022). (Un)Just deserts: Examining resource deserts and the continued significance of racism on health in the urban South. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 8(4), 483-502. doi:10.1177/23326492221112424

  12. Stepanikova, I., & Oates, G. R. (2017). Perceived discrimination and privilege in health care: The role of socioeconomic status and race. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(1), 86-94. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.024

  13. Macias-Konstantopoulos, W. L., Collins, K. A., Diaz, R., Duber, H. C., Edwards, C. D., Hsu, A. P., Ranney, M. L., Riviello, R. J., Wettstein, Z. S., & Sachs, C.J. (2023). Race, healthcare, and health disparities: A critical review and recommendation for advancing health equity. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health, 24(5), 906-918. doi:10.5811/westjem.58408

  14. Braveman, P. A., Arkin, E., Proctor, D., Kauh, T., & Holm, N. (2022). Systemic and structural racism: Definitions, examples, health damages, and approaches to dismantling. Health Affairs, 41(2), 171-178. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01394

  15. Ghoshal, M., Shapiro, H., Todd, K., & Schatman, M. E. (2020). Chronic noncancer pain management and systemic racism: Time to move toward equal care standards. Journal of Pain Research, 13(1), 2825-2836. doi:10.2147/JPR.S287314

  16. Walker Taylor, J. L., Campbell, C. M., Thorpe Jr., R. J., Whitfield, K. E., Nkimbeng, M., & Szanton, S. L. (2018). Pain, racial discrimination, and depressive symptoms among African American women. Pain Management Nursing, 19(1), 79-87. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2017.11.008

  17. Bazargan, M., Cobb, S., Assari, S., & Bazargan-Hejazi, S. (2022). Physical and mental health quality of life among underserved African American and Latino older adults. Ethnicity & Health, 28(2), 217-233. doi:10.1080/13557858.2022.2027886

  18. Guadamuz, J. S., Wilder, J. R., Mouslim, M. C., Zenk, S. N., Alexander, G. C., & Qato, D. M. (2021). Fewer pharmacies in Black and Hispanic/Latino neighborhoods compared with White or diverse neighborhoods, 2007-15. Health Affairs, 40(5), 802-811. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01699

  19. Brînzac, M. G., Kuhlmann, E., Dussault, G., Ungureanu, M. I., Cherecheș, R. M., & Baba, C. O. (2023). Defining medical deserts–An international consensus-building exercise. European Journal of Public Health, 33(5), 785-788. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckad107

  20. Chisholm-Burns, M. A., Spivey, C. A., Gatwood, J., Wiss, A., Hohmeier, K., & Erickson, S. R. (2017). Evaluation of racial and socioeconomic disparities in medication pricing and pharmacy access and services. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 74(19), 653-668. doi:10.2146/ajhp150872

  21. Ganguli, I., Mackwood, M. B., Yang, C. W., Crawford, M., Mulligan, K. L., O’Malley, A. J., Fisher, E. S., & Morden, N. E. (2023). Racial differences in low value care among older adult Medicare patients in US health systems: Retrospective cohort study. British Medical Journal, 383(1). doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-074908

  22. Yearby, R., Clark, B., & Figueroa, J. F. (2022). Structural racism in historical and modern US health care policy. Health Affairs, 41(2), 187-194. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01466

  23. Alba, C., Zheng, Z., & Wadhera, R. K. (2024). Changes in health care access and preventive health screenings by race and ethnicity. Journal of the American Medical Association Health Forum, 5(2). doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5058

  24. Powell, M., Richmond, J., Mohottige, D., Yen, I., Joslyn, A., & Corbie-Smith, G. (2019). Medical mistrust, racism, and delays in preventive health screening among African-American men. Behavioral Medicine, 45(2), 102-117. doi:10.1080/08964289.2019.1585327

  25. Siegel, R. L., Kratzer, T. B., Giaquinto, A. N., & Sung, H. (2025). Cancer statistics, 2025. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 75(1), 10-45. doi:10.3322/caac.21871

  26. Kurumety, S. K., Howshar, J. T., & Loving, V. A. (2023). Breast cancer screening and outcomes disparities persist for Native American women. Journal of Breast Imaging, 5(1), 3-10. doi:10.1093/jbi/wbac080

  27. Roubidoux, M. A., Kaur, J. S., & Rhoades, D. A. (2022). Health disparities in cancer among American Indians and Alaska natives. Academic Radiology, 29(7), 1013-1021. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2021.10.011

  28. Ginsburg, O., Yip, C., Brooks, A., Cabanes, A., Caleffi, M., Dunstan Yataco, J. A., Gyawali, B., McCormack, V., Murillo, R., Pace, L. E., Paskett, E. D., Romanoff, A., Unger-Saldaña, K, Vanderpuye, V., Wu, T., Yuma, S., Dvaladze, A., Duggan, C., & Anderson, B. O. (2020). Breast cancer early detection: a phased approach to implementation. Cancer, 126(S10), 2379-2393. doi:10.1002/cncr.32887

  29. Crosby, D., Bhatia, S., Brindle, K. M., Coussens, L. M., Dive, C., Emberton, M., Esener, S., Fitzgerald, R. C., Gambhir, S. S., Kuhn, P., Rebbeck, T. R., & Balasubramanian, S. (2022). Early detection of cancer. Science, 375(6586). doi:10.1126/science.aay9040

  30. Cosgrove, G. P., Bianchi, P., Danese, S., & Lederer, D. J. (2018). Barriers to timely diagnosis of interstitial lung disease in the real world: The INTENSITY survey. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 18(9). doi:10.1186/s12890-017-0560-x

  31. Star, J., Bandi, P., Nargis, N., Islami, F., Yabroff, K. R., Minihan, A. K., Smith, R. A., & Jemal, A. (2023). Updated review of major cancer risk factors and screening test use in the United States, with a focus on changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 32(7), 879-888. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0114

  32. Doan, L. V., Yoon, J., Chun, J., Perez, R., & Wang, J. (2023). Pain associated with breast cancer: Etiologies and therapies. Frontiers in Pain Research, 4(1). doi:10.3389/fpain.2023.1182488

  33. Kamgar, M., Assad, H., Hastert, T. A., McLaughlin, E., Reding, K., Paskett, E. D., Bea, J. W., Shadyab, A. H., Neuhouser, M. L., Nassir, R., Crane, T. E., Sreeram, K., Greenwald, M. K., & Simon, M. S. (2020). Peripheral neuropathy after breast cancer: An analysis of data from the Women’s Health Initiative Life and Longevity After Cancer cohort. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38(15). doi:10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.e24093

  34. Colosia, A., Njue, A., Bajwa, Z., Dragon, E., Robinson, R. L. , Sheffield, K. M., Thakkar, S., & Richiemer, S. H. (2022). The burden of metastatic cancer-induced bone pain: A narrative review. Journal of Pain Research, 15, 3399-3412. doi:10.2147/JPR.S371337

  35. Jin, L., Han, B., Siegel, E., Cui, Y., Giuliano, A., & Cui, X. (2018). Breast cancer lung metastasis: Molecular biology and therapeutic implications. Cancer Biology & Therapy, 19(10), 858-868. doi:10.1080/15384047.2018.1456599

  36. Danforth, D. (2021). The role of chronic inflammation in the development of breast cancer. Cancers, 13(15), 3918. doi:10.3390/cancers13153918

  37. Nishigami, T., Manfuku, M., & Lahousse, A. (2023). Central sensitization in cancer survivors and its clinical implications: State of the art. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(14). doi:10.3390/jcm12144606

  38. Schwab, L., & Visovsky, C. (2023). Psychological distress and quality of life in breast cancer survivors with taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy: A scoping review. Frontiers in Oncology, 12(1). doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.1005083

  39. Mestdagh, F., Steyaert, A., & Lavand’homme, P. (2023). Cancer pain management: A narrative review of current concepts, strategies, and techniques. Current Oncology, 30(7), 6838-6858. doi:10.3390/curroncol30070500

  40. Overstreet, D. S., Pester, B. D., Wilson, J. M., Flowers, K. M., Kline, N. K., & Meints, S. M. (2022). The experience of BIPOC living with chronic pain in the USA: Biopsychosocial factors that underlie racial disparities in pain outcomes, comorbidities, inequities, and barriers to treatment. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 27(1), 1-10. doi:10.1007/s11916-022-01098-8

  41. Pham, T. V., Doorley, J., Kenney, M., Joo, J. H., Shallcross, A. J., Kincade, M., Jackson, J., & Vranceanu, A. M. (2023). Addressing chronic pain disparities between Black and White people: A narrative review of socio-ecological determinants. Pain Management, 13(8), 473–496. doi:10.2217/pmt-2023-0032

  42. Chin, M. H., Afsar-Manesh, N., Bierman, A. S., Chang, C., Colón-Rodríguez, C. J., Dullabh, P., Duran, D. G., Fair, M., Hernandez-Boussard, T., Hightower, M., Jain, A., Jordan, W. B., Konya, S., Moore, R. H., Moore, T. T., Rodriguez, R., Shaheen, G., Snyder, L. P., Srinivasan, M., Umscheid, C. A., & Ohno-Machado, L. (2023). Guiding principles to address the impact of algorithm bias on racial and ethnic disparities in health and health care. Journal of the American Medical Association Network Open, 6(12). doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.45050

  43. Canedo, J. R., Miller, S. T., Myers, H. F., & Sanderson, M. (2019). Racial and ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing in the US: Systematic review. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 28(3), 587-601. doi:10.1002/jgc4.1078

  44. Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447-453. doi:10.1126/science.aax2342

  45. Varnosfaderani, S. M., & Forouzanfar, M. (2024). The role of AI in hospitals and clinics: Transforming healthcare in the 21st century. Bioengineering, 11(4), 337. doi:10.3390/bioengineering11040337

  46. El-Azab, S., & Nong, P. (2023). Clinical algorithms, racism, and “fairness” in healthcare: A case of bounded justice. Big Data & Society, 10(2). doi:10.1177/20539517231213820

  47. Liu, P., Sawhney, S., Heide-Jørgensen, U., Quinn, R. R., Jensen, S. K., Mclean, A., Christiansen, C. F., Gerds, T. A., & Ravani, P. (2024). Predicting the risks of kidney failure and death in adults with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease: Multinational, longitudinal, population based, cohort study. British Medical Journal, 385(1). doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-078063

  48. Huang, T., Shu, Y. & Cai, Y. D. (2015). Genetic differences among ethnic groups. BMC Genomics, 16. doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2328-0

  49. Letzen, J. E., Mathur, V. A., Janevic, M. R., Burton, M. D., Hood, A. M., Morais, C. A., Booker, S. Q., Campbell, C. M., Aroke, E. N., Goodin, B. R., Campbell, L. C., & Merriwether, E. N. (2022). Confronting racism in all forms of pain research: Reframing study designs. The Journal of Pain, 23(6), 893–912. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2022.01.010

  50. Timbrell, N. E. (2024). The role and limitations of the reference interval within clinical chemistry and its reliability for disease detection. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 81(1). doi:10.3389/bjbs.2024.12339

  51. Jain, A., Brooks, J. R., Alford, C. C., Chang, C. S., Mueller, N. M., Umscheid, C. A., & Bierman, A. S. (2023). Awareness of racial and ethnic bias and potential solutions to address bias with use of health care algorithms. Journal of American Medical Association Health Forum, 4(6). doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1197

  52. Rappoport, N., Paik, H., Oskotsky, B., Tor, R., Ziv, E., Zaitlen, N., & Butte, A. J. (2018). Comparing ethnicity-specific reference intervals for clinical laboratory tests from EHR data. The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine, 3(3), 366–377. doi:10.1373/jalm.2018.026492

  53. Wong, N. D., Budoff, M. J., Ferdinand, K., Graham, I. M., Michos, E. D., Reddy, T., Shapiro, M. D., & Toth, P. P. (2022). Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment: An American Society for Preventive Cardiology clinical practice statement. American Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 10(1). doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2022.100335

  54. Anderson, T. S., Wilson, L. M., & Sussman, J. B. (2024). Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk estimates using the predicting risk of cardiovascular disease events equations. Journal of American Medical Association Internal Medicine, 184(8), 963–970. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1302

  55. Bansal, M., Ranjan, S.,& Kasliwal, R. R. (2020). Cardiovascular risk calculations and their applicability to South Asians. Current Diabetes Reviews, 17(9). doi:10.2174/1573399816999201001204020

  56. Palaniappan, L., Garg, A., Enas, E., Lewis, H., Bari, S., Gulati, M., Flores, C., Mathur, A., Molina, C., Narula, J., Rahman, S., Leng, J., & Gany, F. (2018). South Asian cardiovascular disease & cancer risk: Genetics & pathophysiology. Journal of Community Health, 43(1), 1100–1114. doi:10.1007/s10900-018-0527-8

  57. Shah, K. S., Patel, J., Al Rifai, M., Agarwala, A., Bhatt, A. B., Levitzky, Y. S., & Palaniappan, L. (2022). Cardiovascular risk management in the South Asian patient: A review. Health Sciences Review, 4(1). doi:10.1016/j.hsr.2022.100045

  58. Patel, A. P., Wang, M., Kartoun, U., Ng, K., & Khera, A. V. (2021). Quantifying and understanding the higher risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease among South Asian individuals. Circulation, 144(6), 410–422. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052430

  59. Kalra, D., Vijayaraghavan, K., Sikand, G., Desai, N. R., Joshi, P. H., Mehta, A., Karmally, W., Vani, A., Sitafalwalla, S. J., Puri, R., Duell, P. B., & Brown, A. (2021). Prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in South Asians in the US: A clinical perspective from the National Lipid Association. Journal of Clinical Lipidology, 15(3), 402–422. doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2021.03.007

  60. Nanayakkara, G. L., Rai, T., Kirincic, L., Lightfoot, R., Senaratne, J. M., & Senaratne, M. (2021). Differences in clinical measures and outcomes in South Asians vs Caucasians attending cardiac rehabilitation. CJC Open, 3(8), 1019–1024. doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2021.03.014

  61. Makover, M. E., Shapiro, M. D., & Toth, P. P. (2022). There is urgent need to treat atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk earlier, more intensively, and with greater precision: A review of current practice and recommendations for improved effectiveness. American Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 12(1). doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2022.100371

  62. Jurgens, C. Y., Lee, C. S., Aycock, D. M., Masterson Creber, R., Denfeld, Q. E., DeVon, H. A., Evers, L. R., Jung, M., Pucciarelli, G., Streur, M. M., & Konstam, M. A. (2022). State of the science: The relevance of symptoms in cardiovascular disease and research: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 146(12), e173–e184. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001089

  63. Jumreornvong, O., Perez, A. M., Malave, B., Mozawalla, F., Kia, A., & Nwaneshiudu, C.A. (2025). Biases in artificial intelligence application in pain medicine. Journal of Pain Research, 18, 1021-1033. doi:10.2147/JPR.S495934

  64. Bayne, J., Garry, J., & Albert, M.A. (2023). Brief review: Racial and ethnic disparities in cardiovascular care with a focus on congenital heart disease and precision medicine. Current Atherosclerosis Reports, 25(1), 189–195. doi:10.1007/s11883-023-01093-3

  65. Agarwal, A. K., Gonzales, R. E., Sagan, C., Nijim, S., Asch, D. A., Merchant, R. M., & South, E. C. (2024). Perspectives of Black patients on racism within emergency care. Journal of American Medical Association Health Forum, 5(3). doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0046

  66. Goldfarb, S. S., Graves, K., Geletko, K., Hansen, M. D., Kinsell, H., & Harman, J. (2023). Racial and ethnic differences in emergency department wait times for patients with substance use disorder. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 64(4), 481–487. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.02.015

  67. Zhang, X., Carabello, M., Hill, T., Bell, S. A., Stephenson, R., & Mahajan, P. (2020). Trends of racial/ethnic differences in emergency department care outcomes among adults in the United States from 2005 to 2016. Frontiers in Medicine, 7(300). doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.00300

  68. Qiao, W. P., Powell, E. S., Witte, M. P., & Zelder, M. R. (2016). Relationship between racial disparities in ED wait times and illness severity. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 34(1), 10–15. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.052

  69. Ikeme, S., Kottenmeier, E., Uzochukwu, G., & Brinjikji, W. (2022). Evidence-based disparities in stroke care metrics and outcomes in the United States: A systematic review. Stroke, 53(3), 670–679. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.036263

  70. Chang, T., Nuppnau, M., He, Y., Kocher, K. E., Valley, T. S., Sjoding, M. W., & Wiens, J. (2024). Racial differences in laboratory testing as a potential mechanism for bias in AI: A matched cohort analysis in emergency department visits. PLOS Global Public Health, 4(10). doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003555

  71. Gopal, D. P., Chetty, U., O’Donnell, P., Gajria, C., & Blackadder-Weinstein, J. (2021). Implicit bias in healthcare: Clinical practice, research and decision making. Future Healthcare Journal, 8(1), 40–48. doi:10.7861/fhj.2020-0233

  72. Ceccarelli, I., Bagnis, A., Ottaviani, C., Thayer, J. F., & Mattarozzi, K. (2024). Racial biases, facial trustworthiness, and resting heart rate variability: Unravelling complexities in pain recognition. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 9(1). doi:10.1186/s41235-024-00588-0

  73. Boley, S., Sidebottom, A., Vacquier, M., Watson, D., Olsen, J., Echols, K., & Friedman, S. (2022). Investigating racial disparities within an emergency department rapid-triage system. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 60(1), 65–72. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2022.07.030

  74. Agarwal, A. K., Gonzales, R. E., Sagan, C., Nijim, S., Asch, D. A., Merchant, R. M., & South, E. C. (2024). Perspectives of Black patients on racism within emergency care. Journal of American Medical Association Health Forum, 5(3). doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0046

  75. Nguyen, L. H., Dawson, J. E., Brooks, M., Khan, J. S., & Telusca, N. (2023). Disparities in pain management. Anesthesiology Clinics, 41(2), 471–488. doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2023.03.008

  76. Hausmann, L. R. M., Jones, A. L., McInnes, S. E., & Zickmund, S. L. (2020). Identifying healthcare experiences associated with perceptions of racial/ethnic discrimination among veterans with pain: A cross-sectional mixed methods survey. PLOS one, 15(9). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237650

  77. Strand, N. H., Mariano, E. R., Goree, J. H., Narouze, S., Doshi, T. L., Freeman, J. A., & Pearson, A. C. S. (2021). Racism in pain medicine: We can and should do more. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 96(6), 1394–1400. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.02.030

  78. Morden, N. E., Chyn, D., Wood, A., & Meara, E. (2021). Racial inequality in prescription opioid receipt—Role of individual health systems. New England Journal of Medicine, 385(4), 342–351. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa2034159

  79. Drake, J., Charles, C., Bourgeois, J. W., Daniel, E. S., & Kwende, M. (2020). Exploring the impact of the opioid epidemic in Black and Hispanic communities in the United States. Drug Science, Policy and Law, 6(1). doi:10.1177/2050324520940428

  80. Gondré-Lewis, M. C., Abijo, T., & Gondré-Lewis, T. A. (2023). The opioid epidemic: A crisis disproportionately impacting Black Americans and urban communities. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 10(4), 2039–2053. doi:10.1007/s40615-022-01384-6

  81. Judd, D., King, C. R., & Glake, C. (2023). The opioid epidemic: A review of the contributing factors, negative consequences, and best practices. Cureus, 15(7). doi:10.7759/cureus.41621

  82. Jannetto, P. J. (2021). The North American opioid epidemic. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, 43(1), 1-5. doi:10.1097/FTD.0000000000000817 

  83. Santoro, T. N., & Santoro, J. D. (2018). Racial bias in the US opioid epidemic: A review of the history of systemic bias and implications for care. Cureus, 10(12). doi:10.7759/cureus.3733

  84. Armenian, P., Vo, K., Barr-Walker, J., Lynch (2018). Fentanyl, fentanyl analogs and novel synthetic opioids: A comprehensive review. Neuropharmacology, 134(A), 121-132. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.10.016 

  85. Ghonasgi, R., Paschke, M. E., Winograd, R. P., Wright, C., Selph, E., & Banks, D. E. (2024). The intersection of substance use stigma and anti-Black racial stigma: A scoping review. International Journal of Drug Policy, 133(1). doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104612

  86. Morden et al., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa2034159 Morden, N. E.; Chyn, D.; Wood, A.; Meara, E. Racial Inequality in Prescription Opioid Receipt — Role of Individual Health Systems. New England Journal of Medicine 2021, 385 (4), 342–351. doi:10.1056/nejmsa2034159.

  87. Schroeder, A. R., Dehghan, M., Newman, T. B., Bentley, J. P., Park, K. T. (2019). Association of opioid prescriptions from Dental clinicians for US adolescents and young adults with subsequent opioid use and abuse. Journal of American Medical Association Internal Medicine, 179(2), 145–152. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5419

  88. Compton, W. M., Jones, C. M., & Baldwin, G. T. (2016). Relationship between nonmedical prescription-opioid use and heroin use. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(2), 154–163. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1508490

  89. Pyra, M., Taylor, B., Flanagan, E., Hotton, A., Johnson, O., Lamuda, P., Schneider, J., & Pollack, H. A. (2022). Support for evidence-informed opioid policies and interventions: The role of racial attitudes, political affiliation, and opioid stigma. Preventive Medicine, 158(1). doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107034

  90. James, K., & Jordan, A. (2018). The opioid crisis in Black communities. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 46(2), 404–421. doi:10.1177/1073110518782949

  91. Bazargan, M., Cobb, S., & Assari, S. (2021). Discrimination and medical mistrust in a racially and ethnically diverse sample of California adults. The Annals of Family Medicine, 19(1), 4. doi:10.1370/afm.2632

  92. Goyal, M. K., Kuppermann, N., Cleary, S. D., Teach, S. J., & Chamberlain, J. M. (2015). Racial disparities in pain management of children with appendicitis in emergency departments. Journal of American Medical Association Pediatrics, 169(11), 996–1002. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1915

  93. Badreldin, N., Grobman, W. A., & Yee, L. M. (2019). Racial disparities in postpartum pain management. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 134(6), 1147-1153. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003561

  94. Johnson, J. D., Asiodu, I. V., McKenzie, C. P., Tucker, C., Tully, K. P., Bryant, K., Verbiest, S., & Stuebe, A. M. (2019). Racial and ethnic inequities in postpartum pain evaluation and management. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 134(6), 1155-1162. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003505

  95. Bornstein, E., Eliner, Y., Chervenak, F. A., & Grünebaum, A. (2020). Racial disparity in pregnancy risks and complications in the US: Temporal changes during 2007–2018. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(5). doi:10.3390/jcm9051414

  96. Calcutt, N. A. (2020). Diabetic neuropathy and neuropathic pain: A (con)fusion of pathogenic mechanisms? PAIN, 161(1). doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001922

  97. Lipman, T. H., Smith, J. A., Patil, O.,Willi, S. M., & Hawkes, C. P. (2020). Racial disparities in treatment and outcomes of children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatric Diabetes, 22(2), 241–248. doi:10.1111/pedi.13139

  98. Meints, S. M., Cortes, A., Morais, C. A., & Edwards, R. R. (2019). Racial and ethnic differences in the experience and treatment of noncancer pain. Pain Management, 9(3), 317–334. doi:10.2217/pmt-2018-0030

  99. Thompson, T., Stathi, S., Shin, J. I., Carvalho, A., Solmi, M., & Liang, C. S. (2024). Racial and ethnic disparities in the prescribing of pain medication in US primary care settings, 1999–2019: Where are we now? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 39(9), 1597–1605. doi:10.1007/s11606-024-08638-5

  100. Gonzalez, C. M., Ark, T. K., Fisher, M. R., Marantz, P. R., Burgess, D. J., Milan, F., Samuel, M. T., Lypson, M. L., Rodriguez, C. J., & Kalet, A. L. (2024). Racial implicit bias and communication among physicians in a simulated environment. Journal of American Medical Association Network Open, 7(3). doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2181

  101. Mhadhbi, H., MacMillan, A., Draper-Rodi, J., Ménard, M., & Sposato, N. S. (2025). Advancing equitable osteopathic practice: integrating person-centredness & addressing racial biases through the lens of critical theory. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 55(1). doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2025.100752

  102. Jayathilake, N. J., Phan, T. T., Kim, J., Lee, K. P., & Park, J. M. (2025). Modulating neuroplasticity for chronic pain relief: Noninvasive neuromodulation as a promising approach. Experimental & Molecular Medicine, 57(3), 501–514. doi:10.1038/s12276-025-01409-0

  103. Dodds, K. N., Beckett, E. A. H., Evans, S. F., Grace, P. M., Watkins, L. R., & Hutchinson, M. R. (2016). Glial contributions to visceral pain: implications for disease etiology and the female predominance of persistent pain. Translational Psychiatry, 6(9). doi:10.1038/tp.2016.168

  104. Dinakar, P., & Stillman, A. M. (2016). Pathogenesis of pain. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 23(3), 201–208. doi:10.1016/j.spen.2016.10.003

  105. Volcheck, M. M., Graham, S. M., Fleming, K. C., Mohabbat, A. B., & Luedtke, C. A. (2023). Central sensitization, chronic pain, and other symptoms: Better understanding, better management. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 90(4), 245-254. doi:10.3949/ccjm.90a.22019

  106. Van Griensven, H., Schmid, A., Trendafilova, T., & Low, M. (2020). Central sensitization in musculoskeletal pain: Lost in translation? Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 50(11), 592-596. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.0610

  107. Armstrong, M., Castellanos, J., & Christie, D. (2024). Chronic pain as an emergent property of a complex system and the potential roles of psychedelic therapies. Frontiers in Pain Research, 5(1). doi:10.3389/fpain.2024.1346053

  108. Borsook, D., Youssef, A. M., Simons, L., Elman, I., & Eccleston, C. (2018). When pain gets stuck: The evolution of pain chronification and treatment resistance. PAIN, 159(12), 2421-2436. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001401

  109. Hobson, J. M., Moody, M. D., Sorge, R. E., & Goodin, B. R. (2022). The neurobiology of social stress resulting from racism: Implications for pain disparities among racialized minorities. Neurobiology of Pain, 12(1). doi:10.1016/j.ynpai.2022.100101

  110. Hood, A. M., Morais, C. A., Fields, L. N., Merriwether, E. N., Brooks, A. K., Clark, J. F., McGill, L. S., Janevic, M. R., Letzen, J. E., & Campbell, L. C. (2023). Racism exposure and trauma accumulation perpetuate pain inequities–Advocating for change (RESTORATIVE): A conceptual model. American Psychologist, 78(2), 143-159. doi:10.1037/amp0001042

  111. Paradies, Y., Ben, J., Denson, N., Elias, A., Priest, N., Pieterse, A., Gupta, A., Kelaher, M., & Gee, G. (2015). Racism as a determinant of health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS One, 10(9). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138511

  112. Duenas, M., Ojeda, B., Salazar, A., Mico, J. A., & Failde, I. (2016). A review of chronic pain impact on patients, their social environment and the health care system. Journal of Pain Research, 2016(9), 457-467. doi:10.2147/JPR.S105892

  113. Oakley, L. P., Harvey, S. M., & López-Cevallos, D. F. (2018). Racial and ethnic discrimination, medical mistrust, and satisfaction with birth control services among young adult Latinas. Women’s Health Issues, 28(4), 313–320. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2018.03.007

  114. Alsan, M., Wanamaker, M., & Hardeman, R.R. (2020). The Tuskegee study of untreated syphilis: A case study in peripheral trauma with implications for health professionals. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35(1), 322–325. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05309-8

  115. Paul, C., & Brookes, B. (2015). The rationalization of unethical research: revisionist accounts of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and the New Zealand “unfortunate experiment.” American Journal of Public Health, 105(10). doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302720

  116. Tobin, M. J. (2022). Fiftieth anniversary of uncovering the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: The story and timeless lessons. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 205(10), 1145–1158. doi:10.1164/rccm.202201-0136SO

  117. Stamm L. V. (2016). Syphilis: Re-emergence of an old foe. Microbial Cell, 3(9), 363–370. doi:10.15698/mic2016.09.523

  118. Reverby, S. (2022). The Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.013.1032

  119. Alsan, M., & Wanamaker, M. (2018). Tuskegee and the health of Black men. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(1), 407–455. doi:10.1093/qje/qjx029

  120. O’Brien, E., & Rich, M. (2022). Obstetric violence in historical perspective. The Lancet, 399(10342), 2183–2185. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01022-4

  121. Novak, N. L., Lira, N., O’Connor, K. E., Harlow, S. D., Kardia, S. L. R., & Stern, A. M. (2018). Disproportionate sterilization of Latinos under California’s eugenic sterilization program, 1920–1945. American Journal of Public Health, 108(5), 611–613. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2018.304369

  122. Schickler, R., Whittum, M., Fanarjian, N., Rapkin, R., & Nguyen, B. T. (2021). The history of female surgical sterilization: A social and ethics perspective. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, 37(6), 465–469. doi:10.1089/gyn.2021.0102

  123. Leason, J. (2021). Forced and coerced sterilization of Indigenous women. Canadian Family Physician, 67(7), 525. doi:10.46747/cfp.6707525

  124. Sutton, M. Y., Anachebe, N. F., Lee, R., & Skanes, H. (2021). Racial and ethnic disparities in reproductive health services and outcomes, 2020. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 137(2), 225-233. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004224

  125. Averbach, S., Ha, D., Meadows, A., Brubaker, L., & Gyamfi-Bannerman, C. (2023). Failure to progress: Structural racism in women’s healthcare. eClinicalMedicine, 57(1), 101861. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101861

  126. Miller, F., & Miller, P. (2021). Transgenerational trauma and trust restoration. American Medical Association Journal of Ethics, 23(6), 480-486. doi:10.1001/amajethics.2021.480

  127. Garvick, S. J., Banz, J., Chin, M., Fesler, K., Olson, A. M., Wolff, E., & Gregory, T. (2023). Racial disparities in pain management: Historical maleficence and solutions for equity. JAAPA, 36(11), 37-41. doi:10.1097/01.JAA.0000979472.53675.b6

  128. Keeys, M., Baca, J., & Maybank, A. (2021). Race, racism, and the policy of 21st century medicine. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 94(1), 153-157. PMID:33795992

Previous
Previous

‘Only Love Can Hurt Like This’: Understanding Broken Heart Syndrome

Next
Next

Healing Through Hormones: The Neurobiological Effects of Hormone Replacement Therapy